1. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE FREE.
2. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE HEALTHY.
3. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE BRILLIANT.
4. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE SAFE.
5. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE LOVED.
6. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE COURAGEOUS.
7. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE ALIVE.
8. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE TRUSTED.
9. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE EDUCATED.
10. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW YOUR RIGHTS.
What is your reaction to those ten points?
- Is it something like – “Yes, they all make sense.”
- Or is it something like – “No, that’s bullshit.”
- Or is it something like – “Hmmm….tell me what the source is first?”
If it is the second one, fine. Off you go. You’re welcome to this site, but you probably won’t find anything you want here.
If it’s the third one, fine – here’s the source.
Now you know the source, is your answer 1 or 2?
Just a thought for the day. Hat-tip to The Edge of Sports podcast.
Sorry we haven’t been posting much lately. We hope to get back to it soon. JLP
It is pretty well known that San Francisco is one of, if not the, most liberal cities in the USA.
It is also relatively well known that the NFL’s franchise owners make up arguably the most conservative group in world sport.
So what happens when the two come together? We may be about to find out.
Democracy Now! has the story…
Colin Kaepernick remained seated while his teammates stood for the playing of “The Star-Spangled Banner” ahead of a match against the Green Bay Packers.
In the interest of full disclosure, the 49ers happen to be the author’s favourite football team. Do I believe this to be an honourable action by Kaepernick? In sentiment, definitely. His heart is most certainly in the right place.
“I’ll continue to sit. I’m going to continue to stand with the people that are being oppressed. To me, this is something that has to change. And when there’s significant change and I feel like that flag represents what it’s supposed to represent, and this country is representing people the way that it’s supposed to, I’ll stand.”
Do I think it will actually lead to anything being done about race relations among US police? To use a football term, it’s probably something of a “Hail Mary pass”.
It will be interesting to see how owners, fans & mainstream media react to this “stance”, especially if he proceeds to carry it through the upcoming season.
When we gather around the watercooler discussing the Olympic games today here in Ireland, according to the media we are meant to be focusing on two topics…Thomas Barr’s agonising 4th place finish in the hurdles despite setting another personal best time, or the ticket-touting scandal involving Irishman Pat Hickey, President of the IOC.
On the Barr story, fine. Of course we should be celebrating actual sporting success. While I haven’t really paid much mind to these games, naturally I’m happy when it’s Irish men and women doing so well. Personally my favourite story is that of Annalise Murphy, mostly because I had the pleasure of meeting her at a rugby event in the Aviva Stadium not long after the 2012 Olympics. I found her post-event interview a joy to watch because it was so obvious just how happy she was with her medal and that’s what it’s all about from the sporting side of things.
But when it comes to scandals, I couldn’t give a damn about ticket touting. So a few people at the top were trying to make a quick buck here and there. What of it.
Why the indifference? Stories like this one from the Huffington Post entitled The Olympics Are Always A Disaster For Poor People.
Displacement of the urban poor is a hallmark of the modern Olympics, a virtual certainty rather than an accidental occurrence.
In fact, the major beneficiaries of the Olympics are the local and international developers in charge of these projects, as well as the host city’s wealthy residents. The poor lose out.
Sorry if my “bleeding heart liberal”-ness pricks your conscience too much here but I feel that this is what we should ALWAYS be talking about when it comes to the Olympic Games, or any major sporting event for that matter – soccer’s World Cup isn’t much better.