#LoserDonald gets a taste of his own birther medicine

Love, love, love this.

This is the first, but definitely not the last post you will see on this site that features the candidacy of Donald J Trump.

He won’t release his tax returns?  Well what say we speculate as to why…follow the link for more from The Daily Beast.

Donald Trump absolutely, unequivocally did not donate money to the North American Man-Boy Love Association. But that’s not what “some people” are saying.”

NAMBLA Becomes Donald Trump’s Birther Moment

….and so we have our first FPP logo

FPP logo

All I did was play around with the graphics package I discovered on Google this morning so we can proceed with a logo for this site “going forward” (yuk…don’t let me use that phrase ever again!!!)

The design features, as you can see, the letters FPP set against the “equals” symbol which protrudes outside the box representing the kind of thinking I reckon is required to achieve what I consider to be proper “equality” in society.  The colours black and white represent the extremes which will have to be confronted as each issue is tackled.

I’m sure this logo will change in time but it will do for now.  Today, Sunday. August 7, 2016 was the day First Person Plural, an online concept that has been in my head for a long time now, finally came into being.  We’ll see what I can do with it. JLP

 

 

 

When family and politics collide!!! (or some other overly-dramatic title)


I love my Aunt Brenda to bits.  I have to make that perfectly clear.


But naturally, not everyone within a family is going to agree on absolutely everything, and through Facebook I recently learned that my relative was a supporter of Donald J Trump in the upcoming US presidential election, which makes the ideological distance between us infinitely wider than the geographical one (she lives a lot closer to Dublin, California than Dublin, Ireland).


This, also naturally, put me in a quandary.  It is extremely tempting for those on the “Left”* to, at best, question the decision-making of Trump voters and at worst, blatantly make fun of it.  In fact it’s more than tempting….we do it a lot.


So what do we do when it’s a member of your own family?  And not the stereotypical “grumpy uncle that you only see at Thanksgiving” either…someone you actually respect?


Here’s my opinion on debate…first, they are very important things to have.  Second, we have to make sure they actually are debates, for if we find ourselves surrounded by people with whom we agree all the time, they’re not so much debates as mutual back-slapping parties.  And finally, when we are engaging with someone from the “other side”, it is important to find a balance between “remaining respectful” and “challenging what we feel to be misrepresentations put forward by our opponents”.


Which brings me to this Facebook post shared by my Aunt this morning, following a discussion on Fox News which in turn followed Bill Clinton’s address to the Democratic National Convention…



Best said by Bruce Buchanan**:


“Maybe she should have changed husbands after the third or forth affair. Yes she is impressive as a leader, all that dodging sniper fire leading others to safety. And what an organizer, even took on her own private server to organize all that pesky Top-Secret and Classified e-mail she was getting.


This country is so lucky to have her, so we that are really in the know, can have a good laugh at supporters spinning and covering for her.”


And here is my comment…

“Maybe she should have changed husbands after the third or forth affair. ” – What number marriage is Donald Trump on now? And what are his former wives saying about him?


“…all that dodging sniper fire leading others to safety.” – How much sniper fire did Donald Trump dodge when he served his country? None…he just dodged the military altogether and has no experience in a public office that deals with the armed forces either.


“And what an organizer, even took on her own private server….” – Not as good an organizer as Donald Trump – he only bankrupted his business six times. Oh, and where are those tax returns by the way?


Hillary has been running for President for well over a decade now, and considering all the dirt-digging the Republicans must have done in that time, all they have come up with is “Bill was unfaithful, Benghazi and emails”, none of which turned out to be actual federal crimes.


But hey, if Fox News & co keep mentioning them between now and November, maybe enough people will think they ARE crimes to make it look like they “trump” anything done or said by her opponent.

Originally I was disappointed to learn that a family member was on the opposite side of a very important issue.  But now I’m glad of it.  Not that I think I can change her mind, but at least that I can try and understand it, and as you can see by this post, share it.  JLP

* The reason I use inverted commas for the word “Left” is because while I am aware that “Left v Right” is by far the most common way of describing the modern political spectrum, I HATE it – in fact that distinction is pretty much the raison d’etre for this blog.  Since the ”Right” effectively represents less than 1% of the people I don’t see why they should get as much as half the intellectual space in the debate. I find concepts like “Anti-Establishment v Establishment” to be a better fit but I concede that’s a whole lotta letters!

** Not easy to find out who this guy is…you’d think his name would be all over the internet seeing how Fox News are willing to give him a national microphone.  The best description I can dig up is “a professor of government at the University of Texas at Austin”


© JL Pagano 2016

Getting back on the horse



I do have a decent enough reason for not keeping this blog going…my other site actually makes me some money so it is much more deserving of my time.


Having said that, the other site is about sport.  It’s something I love both following and writing about, don’t get me wrong…but I am also very much aware that there are much more important things in this world.  In fact, you could argue that sport is my refuge from those serious things.

Well, now I want to get more involved.

Earlier in the summer I attended a meeting in the Iveagh Grounds at Guinness RFC where Luke “Ming” Flanagan MEP gave a talk on the impending TTIP treaty which is being written and approved by the EU and our government without a whole lot of debate or coverage in the mainstream media.

Following the US progressive online sources (Websites like Mother Jones, Podcasts like Best of the Left, Comedy shows like John Oliver & YouTube channels like The Young Turks) as has been my wont in recent years, I was aware of a similar “behind closed doors” trade agreement called the Trans Pacific Partnership and the outrage that went with it.

So strange as it may seem I actually knew about the Pacific one long before I had heard anything about this one which actually affects the jurisdiction where I actually live!

Anyway they’re having a follow up meeting tonight and I plan to give my thoughts on it here on the blog afterwards.


© JL Pagano 2016

Ní Thosaímid An Tine – ten years on

Exactly ten years ago today I posted these lyrics on my blog at the time (they have had more incarnations than Doctor Who at this rate).
It was my first post to get any kind of widespread attention.  Yeah, I might be patting myself on the back but if I don’t who else will ha ha ha.
Anywho…it’s meant to be Irish history up to 2005 put to the tune of Billy Joel’s “We Didn’t Start The Fire” and it was nominated for Post of The Year at the inaugural Irish Blog Awards.  Didn’t scoop the gong but had a good night meeting fellow bloggers at a time when it was just getting off the ground as a medium on these shores. 
I’d love to have the time to add a few extra verses on the decade that has happened since, something that involves rhymes like “posterity” with “austerity”, etc.  Might be another ten years gone before I get to it though 😉
Druid Law, high kings, Cúchulainn, bronze things
Newgrange, Celts invade, Romans stay away


O’Neill dynasty, St Patrick, snakes flee
Monasteries, Book of Kells, Vikings from Norway


Waterford settlements, Dubh Linn battlements,
Clontarf, Brian Boru, everywhere another war


Many kingdoms come and go, tuatha rule, Strongbow
King Henry, Papal Bull, English army come ashore


Ní thosaímid an tine
It was always burning
Since the world’s been turning
Ní thosaímid an tine
No we didn’t light it
But we tried to fight it

Rule of Anglo Norman Lords, rise of Gaelic folklore,
Kilkenny Statutes, fortify the Pale

Reformation taking hold, Silken Thomas getting bold,
Poynings and Penal Laws, All rebellions fail

Catholicism stands its ground, will not to the king be bound
Cromwell, Will of Orange, Boyne battle, nation torn

Food exported, landlord greed, tenants they have mouths to feed
Wolfe Tone, not alone, Act of Union from the throne
Ní thosaímid an tine
It was always burning
Since the world’s been turning
Ní thosaímid an tine
No we didn’t light it
But we tried to fight it


Dan O’Connell wants repeal, not without the royal seal,
Spud blight, Great Famine, population fell


Irish language in decline, Georgian buldings to design,
IRB, Robert Emmet, Charles Stuart Parnell


Home Rule, Dublin slums, Ulster fears a day will come,
GAA, Land League, Fair, Free, Fixity


Great War, Inspiration, GPO proclamation
Long Fella, Big Fella, War over a Treaty


Ní thosaímid an tine
It was always burning
Since the world’s been turning
Ní thosaímid an tine
No we didn’t light it
But we tried to fight it


Free State, Fianna Fáil, Elections for the first Dáil
Resolution, Constitution, Neutrality


Pull out of the Commonwealth, Economy in poor health
Belfast, Sean Lemass, Behan-Joyce-O’Casey


James Craig, RUC, Gerrymander policy
Bloody Sunday, IRA, what else do I have to say


Ní thosaímid an tine
It was always burning
Since the world’s been turning
Ní thosaímid an tine
No we didn’t light it
But we tried to fight it


John Hume, EEC, Dr Garrett, RTE
CJ Haughey, H-block, Celtic Tiger, Geldof


U2, Boys In Green, D4-Culchie-Jackeen
X case, church and state, Good Friday mandate


Teflon Bertie, Eddie Hobbs, Immigrants do low-paid jobs
Millions wasted everywhere, Young and old in need of care


Can the Troubles be ignored, with Adams-Paisley to the fore
Does it mean an end to war? Cos I can’t take it anymore!


Ní thosaímid an tine
It was always burning
Since the world’s been turning
Ní thosaímid an tine
But when we are gone
Will it still burn on and on and on…


© B Joel 1989, JL Pagano 2005

Your Yes is as good as mine

Up until recently it was my intention to avoid blogging my opinion on the upcoming referendum.

It’s not that I have no feelings on the matter, far from it – it’s just I was pretty sure that while my views on the need for both legislative and constitutional equality are strong, this particular issue of same sex marriage didn’t apply enough to me to warrant expressing an opinion so I thought it best to keep my head down and vote yes.

Then the No campaign started putting forward their arguments which enlightened me that this issue did in fact have a lot to do with me.

“Children deserve a mother and a father”

Both of my biological parents are alive, and though they haven’t had any contact with each other since shortly after I was born near San Francisco, they are both a part of my life today.  

However, for reasons which are definitely for another day’s blogging, I was actually raised by my maternal grandparents who brought me to Ireland at the age of 8, ironically to increase the chances of my receiving a “proper Catholic upbringing”.

So despite being kept apart from my mother and father growing up, I reckon I turned out ok.  Yet going by the No campaign’s dog-whistle rhetoric in the various debates, in the utopian world of the likes of Ronan Mullen, David Quinn and Breda O’Brien, I must somehow be less of a person.

If voting No means that this utopian world remains entrenched in our Constitution, then I am most definitely going to vote Yes, and I’d be surprised if anyone else who was raised by someone other than their birth parents yet wasn’t ashamed of it didn’t do the same.

“Two men can’t replace a mother’s love”

Both of my grandparents passed away a decade ago.  While I still have ties to both biological parents and other family across the USA, the nature of the distance limits regular contact to emails and Facebook posts.  

So basically, my immediate family here in Ireland consists of my wife, our two children (one of which was born just over a week ago) and my two from a previous marriage, who are aged 20 and 17 respectively and very much in our lives.

What I’m getting at is that if something were to happen to both myself and my wife, there is nobody on my side of the family in a position to take the two younger children into their care.  

On my wife’s side, she just has her mother who is in her 80s and her older brother…and since he already has a strong bond with our 6-year-old, responsibility would naturally fall to him.

Unfortunately, because of the issues raised in this referendum, I feel the need to point out that he is both gay and single.  But neither of those facts matter.  

If fate deprives my children of both their mother and their father, then next in line is their uncle, full stop.   And if he happened to be in a loving relationship as well, I cannot begin to understand how that could do anything but help him in what would clearly be difficult circumstances.

***

Of course I am being a little facetious in suggesting that the two issues above somehow tie me to this issue, though the facts about my personal situation are all true.  Nothing about those statements on the No posters relate even remotely to what we’re being asked to vote on this Friday, nor does surrogacy.

My favourite sound bite in last night’s Prime Time debate was from the No side…as soon as the Yes proponents used the phrase “red herring”, they jumped in with the retort “Children are not red herrings”, which I’m sure had their supporters fist-pumping as if some kind of knockout blow had been delivered, when in actual fact it was in itself yet another example of the baseless premises they have used throughout the campaign.

I mean – can someone please tell me where anyone on the Yes side has said children were red herrings?  Didn’t think so.

The No campaign have also made “attacks on their personal beliefs” a cornerstone of their argument.  When they talk about going around being afraid to speak in public about how they feel and who they are for fear of being called names and perceived as pariahs, I am still struggling to understand how they cannot see the irony.

In reality, nobody is attacking what they believe.  I just don’t see why those beliefs need to be enshrined in a Constitution which is meant to be for everyone in the State, not just a subset of those who happen to tick the “right” boxes.

Whatever way the vote goes on Friday, Canon Law will remain as it always was, and if any significant number on the Yes side has a problem with that then I would be very much surprised.  Nobody with any sense is going to go running into Catholic churches demanding that they be gay married.  

Sure, there will be those who are hateful and abusive to people of faith, just as there will be those hateful and abusive to the LBGTI community.  I’d like to think that after Friday the majority of civilised citizens on both sides can come together and demonstrate that such hatred cannot be tolerated.

So given everything the No campaign can muster amounts to mis-direction, it leaves the rest of us to discuss what is actually up for debate, namely the overall issue of Equality which underpins the specific nature of same-sex marriage.

I am very confident that the Yes side will be victorious this weekend, but I do have two concerns, and both involve complacency.

First, there is the fear that many will stay away from the polls because they are sure a victory is going to happen.  We don’t just need victory to happen.  We need it to happen with a statement.  I will be very disappointed if the turnout is less than 75% and/or the Yes vote is less than 60%, though I do believe one happening is dependant on the other.

My second concern is that should this referendum pass as expected, the overall pursuit for true Equality in legislation in Ireland will be put on the back burner.  

The “Left”/progressive side of the population could be tempted to bask in the glory of a decent victory for longer than they should, while the “Right”/conservative side (many of whom are voting Yes) could assume the position “Well you’ve got your same-sex marriage now; we presume you won’t have the cheek to ask for anything else for a long time!”

Equality, be it among those of different sexual orientation, those of different religious beliefs, those of different races, different incomes, different anything really, is never something we should ask for.  It is something we should expect.  

Rónán Mullen constantly talks about the society he’d like to see in Ireland.  Well the society I would like to see is one which includes Rónán Mullen before I know anything about him.  That is why I am voting Yes.  

I have no right to instruct you how to vote.  But if you are on the register please, please, PLEASE make the time to at least exercise your democratic right this Friday. 

#MarRef

PS – On the other question before the people, while I would probably be inclined to vote for a generic 35-year-old candidate before a generic 21-year-old one in a presidential election, I certainly don’t see why we should stop such a hypothetical ballot taking place, so I am also voting yes. 


© JL Pagano 2015

RFK on GNP

Bobby Kennedy said the passage below in a speech three months before he was assassinated. Coincidence? Meh. Probably. 
For  now I’d rather focus on the fact that it was said almost a year to the day before I was born. 
Should I retain hope that at least some in previous generations also believed an economy is a subset of a society and not vice-versa, or should I despair that western “civilization” has learned little or nothing from these words since they were spoken? 
Meh. I’ll go for the hope thing. But it was close. JLP 

Too much and for too long, we seemed to have surrendered personal excellence and community values in the mere accumulation of material things.  Our Gross National Product, now, is over $800 billion dollars a year, but that Gross National Product – if we judge the United States of America by that – that Gross National Product counts air pollution and cigarette advertising, and ambulances to clear our highways of carnage.  It counts special locks for our doors and the jails for the people who break them.  It counts the destruction of the redwood and the loss of our natural wonder in chaotic sprawl.  It counts napalm and counts nuclear warheads and armored cars for the police to fight the riots in our cities.  It counts Whitman’s rifle and Speck’s knife, and the television programs which glorify violence in order to sell toys to our children.  Yet the gross national product does not allow for the health of our children, the quality of their education or the joy of their play.  It does not include the beauty of our poetry or the strength of our marriages, the intelligence of our public debate or the integrity of our public officials.  It measures neither our wit nor our courage, neither our wisdom nor our learning, neither our compassion nor our devotion to our country, it measures everything in short, except that which makes life worthwhile.

University of Kansas
March 18, 1968

The Love That Labour Lost

CTP OFFICIAL LOGOEamonn Gilmore resigned this week, and I am glad he did.

However, I don’t subscribe to the simplistic opinions expressed by so many about the Labour Party.

This coalition government has been far from perfect, but when ever is any kind of government?

What annoys me most of all is that the Labour Party has been pummelled by the electorate on account of “austerity”, particularly because they supposedly “lied” to the people in order to get elected.

As far as I’m concerned, they did not lie.  In their campaign for the 2011 election they spelled out what they would do in a Labour-led government…a fantasy outcome definitely, but still a noble goal for any political entity.

When transpired was a big increase in seats for Labour but nowhere near enough to lead a government.  So what it came down to was whether or not they went in with the Christian-centre-“right” Fine Gael party.

I believe they were correct to go in with FG.  It was the lesser of two evils.  If we think austerity is bad now imagine what it would have been like if Enda was leading a government with a rag-tag band of mostly right-wing independents.  Either the cutbacks to public services would have been much, much worse or we would have had another general election a lot sooner, one which would hardly have guaranteed to bring any more stability.

So where did Labour go wrong? 

Well first I reckon Joan Burton was shafted by Gilmore and Michael Noonan when the cabinet was put together.  It was similar to that episode in Friends when Phoebe was put in charge of “ice and cups”.  Joan made her name in the Dáil by standing up to the financial sector and I don’t think the “old boys network” wanted her anywhere near the department, but I could be wrong.

For me, Gilmore’s biggest mistake in government was in keeping his head down and allowing himself to be openly attacked in the media from all sides.  This perception that he lied in his campaign snowballed to such an extent that it didn’t matter whether or not it was true…you can see in the election results that the public believed it.

And it didn’t help that not only were the attacks coming from the gagillion splintered parties on the so-called “Irish left”, but there was also plenty of sly digs coming from Fine Gael – not always directly, but often through their media outlet Newstalk, or as I call it, BlueshirtFM.

We live in a 24/7 media age, and what’s more, social media is a perfect way to reach young voters and not only get across the true aims of your party, but also to at least respond to the mud being slung at you from all angles.

Joan Burton may not exactly be young, but she does strike me as the type who would have the savvy to appoint people who can use these resources to restore a party’s lost image. 

Not that her task would be an easy one…during the week I saw a tweet from of all “people” Dustin the Turkey (aka a literal puppet of Fianna Fáil’s own spiritual homeland RTE) where he used the hashtag #JoanBrutal.  It’s one thing coming from an individual but I don’t understand why there wasn’t a bigger outcry telling Dustin to keep his beak out.

Ideally, the biggest change I would make to the Labour Party would be in name.  I have nothing against unions whatsoever, but they can’t define a political party if it has realistically aims to form an Irish government. 

As I have already said in this post our anti-establishment politicians are too splintered and need to be brought together somehow – we need an Irish version of the US Democratic Party, because the Irish version of the UK Labour one just isn’t cutting it.

But for now, I’ll make do with a change of leadership, once there’s a major change of attitude that goes along with it. JLP

Update 12noon Sunday June 1 : This tweet from a Dr Tom Clonan* and it is a classic example of the unchallenged attacks on the Labour Party which can be found on all sorts of media.  Remember – my point is not that the attacks are entirely unjustified, it’s just that I rarely see any evidence of the party standing up for itself, neither directly nor indirectly.  As you can see, I took it upon myself to at least challenge his premise.

Clonan tweet

* = [who describes himself as “Captain (Retired) Irish Times Security Analyst. Writer, Broadcaster & Lecturer in Journalism, Political Comms, DIT All Views My Own – Personal”] I

 

Register. Engage. Vote.

“I vote (in elections) for the same reason I’d punch a bear that was eating me. I don’t think it would make a big difference to the outcome, but at least that way it wouldn’t look like I want to be eaten by a bear.”

Nick Doody, comedian

CTP OFFICIAL LOGOI love rugby, which is probably why I run a site on it.  But there’s a good chance that you don’t.  So of course I respect that.

But while I appreciate that it is as much people’s right not to vote as it is for them to actually do it, I don’t have an awful lot of respect for people who simply throw up their hands and say “why should I vote, sure they’re all corrupt”!!!

Of course I fully understand if you don’t want to discuss “politics”.  But despite the impression given by the media, elections are not just about “politics”.  They are about government.  And this is something that affects all of us.

If we have the time to make ourselves experts in rugby, or soap operas, or X Factor, or stamp collecting, or whatever it is we focus on outside the earning of a crust, we should also have the time to have a decent handle on not only who is representing us in government, but also how they’re doing at it.

As far as I’m concerned, the most important statistic emanating from any democratic election for the government of a sovereign nation is not the tally of votes for the individual candidates – rather it is the percentage of the electorate who actually took the time to cast their vote.

There are three simple steps to voting : 1) make sure you are registered 2) engage in the process of finding out who is up for election and what they stand for, and 3) vote.

If you can pay taxes, if you can understand the rules of a sport, if you can keep up with what’s happening on a TV drama show, well let’s face it if you can put together a coherent sentence you can do all of the above steps.

We don’t talk about government enough at the watercooler.  That’s because we’re probably afraid that we can’t do it without discussing politics.

All I’m saying is that if you are eligible to vote in these upcoming elections, please do so, whatever your allegiance.  The more people do, the fewer are the places where the corrupt ones can hide. JLP