Indivisible: A Practical Guide for Resisting the Trump Agenda (could be useful in Ireland too)

indivisible

Naturally there are a lot of things about the Trump presidency I find worrying, but here’s one you won’t hear much about.

I’m worried that when he eventually stops being President (that IS definitely going to happen, right?) many people who have been drawn to following politics will presume order has been restored and think all is right with the world again.  Sure if someone’s not as bad as Trump, their policies have to be ok, right?  As the man himself would say…WRONG!

Some former congressional staffers have put together a handy guide for organizing community political campaigns and putting pressure on your local public representative to resist the Trump agenda, using the Tea Party movement as an example of how it can succeed when done right.  It is very detailed and The Best of the Left podcast this week featured it in audiobook form 

Here’s how it starts…

Donald Trump is the biggest popular-vote loser in history to ever call himself President-Elect. In spite of the fact that he has no mandate, he will attempt to use his congressional majority to reshape America in his own racist, authoritarian, and corrupt image. If progressives are going to stop this, we must stand indivisibly opposed to Trump and the Members of Congress (MoCs) who would do his bidding. Together, we have the power to resist — and we have the power to win.

The thing is…I believe this guide can be used for more issues than just the Trump agenda.

Here in Ireland we have been seen a duopoly of pro-business parties running the country since the formation of the State.  Sure, the regimes led by Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael aren’t exactly in Trump territory, but acknowledging that can be a dangerous thing.  There is a great deal of fixable income equality in this country, and neither party has done much about it over the years.

So I reckon that if you take this guide and make a few substitutions, like “Member of Oireachtas” for “Member of Congress” and “Civil War Parties” for “Trump”, it can help communities up and down the country who have similar views on issues like income equality, housing, water charges & repealing the 8th amendment co-ordinate their action towards pressuring TDs and councillors.

More people should be more interested in their government no matter who is in the White House.  Personally I wouldn’t mind if “Indivisible” was made into a school textbook. JLP

#IANWAE

Website “Human Rights In Ireland” produces form letter for contacting your local TD objecting to US Muslim ban

The below is directly copy/pasted from the website Human Rights In Ireland

We suggest below a draft letter that people concerned with the application of the Executive Order in US pre clearance in Irish airports might find useful should they wish to write to TDs in relation to it. Of course, people should adjust it to reflect their preferred language and approach to the issue, but we hope it might be useful.

Dear

I am writing to you [as a constituent [and] citizen] to express my deep concern about the continued operation of the Aviation (Preclearance) Act 2009 and associated agreements in Irish airports during the administration of President Donald J. Trump.

In the first week and a half of his presidency we have already seen Trump attempt to subvert the Immigration and Nationality Act 1965 in order to apply discrimination in immigration and undermine international refugee law through Executive Order. As a result of the preclearance agreement between Ireland and the USA, this Order is being applied on Irish soil and in Irish airports. As you will be aware, Article II(1) of that agreement makes it clear that Irish law continues to apply in those preclearance areas. The application of this Order may result in, for example, EU Citizens with dual citizenship with a listed country experiencing nationality based discrimination, facilitated by Irish law, in clear contravention of the TFEU. I remind you also that it is not  possible effectively to renounce citizenship in Iran, Syria, Libya and Yemen.

I remind you that under the 2009 Act, those turned away at preclearance are at the frontiers of the state and must be treated in accordance with the Immigration Act 2004. The Irish state also has obligations of non-refoulement which may arise. Furthermore, any Irish officials including Gardaí who may be involved in any way in policing the preclearance area are obliged as always to act in full compliance with the Constitution and with the ECHR.

Even if Congress supports President Trump’s policies through legislation, thus amending the 1965 Act inasmuch as that is constitutionally permissible, Ireland must ensure that rights under the Irish Constitution continue to be protected in these preclearance areas, and that violations of international law are not facilitated through the application of the agreement.

Bearing all of the above in mind, I would be grateful if you could please seek from the Taoiseach and appropriate minister, and provide me with, details of the following:

A. Measures that are being taken to ensure that unlawful discrimination is not being undertaken or facilitated at Irish airports through the application of Trump policy in preclearance areas.
B. Measures that the Irish government is taking to ensure that international refugee law is not subverted through the application of Trump policy in preclearance areas.
C. Mechanisms in place to ensure Ireland’s obligations under the TFEU, the ECHR and other applicable international law are fully complied with in preclearance areas.
D. Procedures for withdrawal from the preclearance agreement and bases upon which withdrawal would be contemplated by the Irish government

All over the United States this weekend lawyers and others have protested against this unlawful, cruel, Islamophobic and xenophobic attempt to undermine the rule of law. I ask the Oireachtas and the Irish government, in my name, to stand with them. I also ask you to ensure that Ireland provides protection to people seeking asylum from Syria, in particular, who President Trump seeks to preclude from receiving refugee status in the United States.

Given the evident urgency of the matter, I look forward to your swift response.

Yours sincerely,

#IANWAE
© First Person Plural 2017

A Week Of President Trump : Jan 20-26,2017

awopt-logo

Quotes & links from the past seven days.

A feature that could last for up to eight years
depending on the ratings, er, I mean polls.

Week 1


Inauguration speech >


Quoting from Bane >

“We give it back to you, the people”


Crowd size comparison >

There is empty ground exposed in the Trump photos. The same spots were almost entirely covered eight years ago


Climate change, LGBT rights, Spanish language among things removed from White House website >

The Obama administration’s priorities of civil rights and climate change were replaced with ‘bringing back jobs and growth’ and ‘rebuild American military’


Women’s March on the Saturday >

Women-led marches took place in over 600 locations spread across seven continents—including Antarctica.


A new twitter account >


Though he’s not yet done with the old one…


Trump speech to CIA >

Trump could have used the speaking opportunity to heal divisions at CIA Headquarters by instead characterizing the media’s oversight of his fledgling presidency, but instead spent the time childishly denying the serious fact that he’s openly attacked our nation’s intelligence community for investigating his dangerous and compromising ties to Russia.


Spicer using lies to scold the press >

“These attempts to lessen the enthusiasm of the inauguration are shameful and wrong.”


Twitter reacts to the lies as only it can >


…as does Kelly-Anne Conway…

Kellyanne Conway, one of President Donald Trump’s top advisers, presented the White House’s false claims about the inaugural crowd size as “alternative facts.”

…and while we have you Kelly, is he going to release his tax returns or not?

“On taxes, answers (& repeated questions) are same from campaign: POTUS is under audit and will not release until that is completed,” tweeted Conway.  (Her) tweet contradicted a statement she made on ABC’s “This Week”…


Trump’s official Day One – Monday. Some legislation by men about women… >

Surrounded by men, President Donald Trump signed an executive order Monday reinstating the “global gag rule,” which bans federal funding for international non-governmental organizations that offer abortions or advocate for the right to an abortion.


And even an actual press conference >

White House press secretary Sean Spicer gave the first question of his first press conference Monday to the New York Post instead of the Associated Press.


Does the President aim to change the internet as we know it?


Even though he’s actually in the White House now, he’s still not happy that he lost the popular vote >

Donald Trump likes golf, so it might not seem surprising that the President took the word of a golfer very seriously when he was weighing up pursuing a federal investigation of voter fraud.


More executive orders….

Pipelines including North Dakota…

…immigration including the wall…

…and so-called “enhanced interrigation techniques”


Each Friday we’ll feature how a different country is portraying the President, this week, the Dutch John Oliver…


Robert Fisk weighs in on the newly presidency and what it could mean for the Middle East >

Compared to the platitudinous, snide, divisive, war-mongering rant the world received from Trump, George W Bush was a visionary


Interesting podcast on the implications of Trump’s pick for Education Secretary – it might be a woman but does that make it a good thing for women?

Nancy Hogshead-Makar is a three-time gold-medalist swimmer, sexual assault survivor, and one of the most renowned Title IX attorneys in the US. We speak to her about the importance of defending Title IX and what a Donald Trump presidency could mean for the landmark 1972 legislation.


MSNBC’s Chris Hayes examines the President’s obsession with his own image in his first week in an interview with possible 2020 Democratic candidate Cory Booker:

The Democratic Senator condemned President Donald Trump for repeating debunked myths about voter fraud, calling on him instead to take action against barriers to voting.


Trump Is Already Betraying the White Working Class, says The New Republic…

His economic policies, like a potential tax on imports from Mexico, would most hurt the very voters he claims to champion.


And finally, we have what should be our starting point for next week’s post, namely the impending meeting with UK Prime Minister Teresa May…

The pair will spend about an hour together in the first visit by a foreign leader to the White House since Mr Trump was sworn in last week.


We’ll be back next Friday at 5pm (Irish time) with Another Week of President Trump.  All going well of course.  JLP

Republicans plan to get congressional dirty work done while media distracted by Trump soundbite-fest

When your goal is to keep an eye on the mainstream media, naturally it’s not all about scrutinising what they actually report.  It is also very important to pay mind to the stuff they leave out of their broadcasts and publications.

Rachel Maddow and Politico are among the few to have latched on to what seems to be a very clear and distinct plan by Mitch McConnell and his fellow Congressional Republicans to minimise the amount of resistance the Democrats can manage against the many changes they want to make under the upcoming Trump administration.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s conference has scheduled six Cabinet-level confirmations hearings for next Wednesday, Jan. 11, the same day the chamber will likely slog through an all-night vote-a-rama on a budget and the president-elect will give his first press conference in six months.

When John Stewart hosted The Daily Show he brilliantly depicted the way the mainstream media can be so easily distracted by using the dog in the Disney movie “Up!”.  The pet had a fancy device attached which meant he could talk but when he was in the middle of talking to you he’d suddenly look away and say…

squirrel

…and what better way to deflect attention from the rake of confirmation hearing for Trump’s Cabinet of Deplorables than to have the man himself say words out loud?

I’ll let Ms Maddow explain as only she can…

#IANWAE

Butchering government – how much has changed in 9 years?

We’re not big into “long posts” on this site, but there will always be exceptions.

Thanks to Facebook’s “You have memories to look back on today” feature we were reminded of this blog post we published in 2008, obviously on a different site.

It is titled “butchering government” and we thought we’d do a repost to see how things stack up now.  Remember…this was written when Bertie was still Taoiseach, George W Bush was still President and anyone who suggested a financial crisis was on the way was recommended for a straight jacket.

Short of an all-out Bolshevik revolution, the Irish left needs to unite and organise itself much in the same way as the other lot have done.

Butchering government

(posted Jan 6, 2008)

In the USA an election can drag on for weeks and sometimes months if the result is close – not only did this happen in the Bush/Gore battle in 2000 but right now there is a hotly contested Senate seat in Minnesota which the republicans are loathe to let go.

Then you have the system in the UK where you can win a seat in the House of Commons merely by having more votes than your opponents – that may seem a no-brainer on the face of it but don’t forget that it means you can still be considered a winner even if more than half the voters plumped for someone else.

So I guess on the face of it, we should be proud here in Ireland that our elected representatives are chosen by means of a system which goes by the general name “proportional representation”.

I wonder – should we really be that proud?

At a party towards the end of last year, I got chatting to a guy who told me he was a butcher. That was a first for me, and I was lost for words.

I mean – what do I say to him : “So, you chop meat, do ya? What’s that like?”

In the end we found football as a common theme to get through the conversation.

Later on I got to thinking about his job. Naturally he would have been highly insulted if I suggested that all he did for a living was chop meat. I mean, surely there are other facets to the job as well, like learning hygiene standards, dealing with suppliers, and of course, handling finicky customers.

But then I came to this conclusion – sure, there may very well be more to being a butcher than just chopping meat, but if you CAN’T chop meat, then I don’t really think you can call yourself a butcher. All the other things might be important as well, but grasping the fundamentals must be done before you can get to the other things.

Writing a blog and the odd polemic as I do, my train of thought then sped down the tracks towards this question : “What exactly is a politician’s answer to chopping meat?”

First, I have to discard the word “politics” for I see it as a very unfortunate one. When we say we are discussing “politics” what we are really talking about is “government”. The politics arises from the fact that different people have different opinions on how government should be run, and as we all know, politics is right there in all walks of life – work, love, family, everywhere.

So that last paragraph should alter my question to : “What exactly is a GOVERNMENT’s answer to chopping meat?”

Ever since I have been following Irish blogs, I have seen numerous complaints about the government of this country, and more often than not, they focus on three things – lack of funding for health, lack of funding for education and in the wake of all that, cronyism which borders on if not actually is out and out corruption.

Last year we had a situation whereby our Taoiseach, the head of our government, was waltzing in and out of a tribunal like he was some kind of rock star, trying and failing to account for large sums of money which were flung in his own direction.

This is not to mention various public moneys being squandered on e-voting machines, hairdo’s in Florida, tragically-planned road projects like the Cash Cow Roundabout which has been knocked down and rebuilt more often than Joan Rivers’ face, plus numerous other bits and pieces.

And all the while, people lie on trollies in A&E wards, children have toilets for classrooms, and we can’t afford ten million for one of the few vaccines for cancer.

So all over the blogs, I see what I consider to be justified revulsion at this state of affairs. But then I appreciate that this is a left-wing viewpoint, and to be fair, the right wing are also entitled to their say.

And what do they generally say? That government’s answer to chopping meat is looking after business.

OK, fine. So to summarize, some of us want to take care of business, some of us want to take care of schools and hospitals.

Taking the late Tony Gregory and Finian McGrath as the only left-wing Independents, as well as reluctantly counting Sinn Fein on the left, here is how I see the current spread of ideology in Dail Eireann…

Total seats- 166; Left – 32 Right – 134.

Answer me this – is THAT what you call proportional representation?

If I stop 166 people on the street around the country, will as many as 134 of them tell me they’d choose business over health and education?

I think not.

So what needs to be done?

Short of an all-out Bolshevik revolution, the Irish left needs to unite and organise itself much in the same way as the other lot have done.

I remember one particular moment from RTÉ’s coverage of the 2007 election. On the panel in their studio was the now Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform Dermot Ahern. The result from Limerick East had just been announced, and up on the monitor was the victor by a clear margin, Ahern’s fellow party member, Minister for Defence and virtual Governor of Limerick Willie O’Dea.

I thought congratulations were sure to be flowing from Deputy Ahern to Deputy O’Dea, but instead, if you can believe this, he was actually mocked!!!

Why? For having the audacity to garner as many as 38% of the first preference votes for himself, that’s why!!!

See, what he SHOULD have done is strategically go around to a portion of his supporters and tell them that it would be better for the party if they didn’t put him first and instead gave FF a shot at getting all three of their candidates into Leinster House. In the end, only two made it, with two more for Fine Gael and one for Labour.

Still, from where I’m standing, that’s four right-wing seats for Limerick East and just the one for the Left.

As long as that remains the status quo, and the Irish Left doesn’t find a way to beat their ideological opposition at their own game, then all our blogging will continue to be merely for our own benefit.

In other words, we’re standing by and letting the right butcher our government, and it’s about time we gave them the chop. Bring on the local elections, I say!

© JL Pagano 2008

Trump’s tabloid of choice is hardly surprising but still worrying to say the least

cruz-jfk

Of all the incredible stuff said by Donald Trump throughout his campaign, large chunks of it were lost in memory as we tried to focus on his most recent offerings.

This one definitely fell through the cracks but is very much gaining significance now.

I’ve always said, ‘Why didn’t the National Enquirer get the Pulitzer Prize for Edwards, and OJ Simpson, and all of these things?’

Yes, he actually said that (out loud, not in a tweet for once), about a publication that literally prints whatever it wants.  And going by the trends shown by its headline articles, like the one above that attacked Ted Cruz, arguably Trump’s biggest rival for the Republican nomination, what it wants more than anything is to show the President Elect in as good a light as possible.

Steve Benen of MaddowBlog examines in more detail :

Its current cover, for example, tells readers President Obama has “ignited” a national security crisis, but Americans shouldn’t worry – because Donald Trump will “fix” the problem.

He discounts the intelligence presented to him by the country’s leading federally-funded agencies yet he’s willing to trust a tabloid available at supermarket counters for just over a dollar.  Not a good sign.

#IANWAE

 

Our favourite Progressive video of 2016

Seems a bit unfair of us to award a title like this, as there were so many candidates throughout the year from such great sources as The Young Turks, Democracy Now and The Majority Report….and let’s not forget great Irish offerings like Gemma O’Doherty’s independently-made documentary on the Mary Boyle case.

But still, we’re going to go for this one from Lee Camp (or as we call him “Geeky Jesus”) from Redacted Tonight.  In under ten minutes he brilliantly captures the misguided nature of the conservative mindset and gives us a few laughs in the process.

News show “Democracy Now!” does exactly what it says on the tin for US VP debate

On Tuesday evening the Vice Presidential candidates in the US election, Senator Tim Kaine (D) and Governor Mike Pence (R) squared off in a debate at Longwood University in Virginia, which is curiously Kaine’s home state.

There are two other candidates running for President who are on the ballot in enough states to have a “realistic” chance of winning the election outright – Jill Stein of the Green Party and Gary Johnson of the Libertaians, but their VP choices were excluded from the debate.

For three election cycles up until 1984, the series of debates was organised by the totally non-partisan League of Women Voters but when they started to insist on “third-party candidates” being included in the process, the duopoly of Republicans and Democrats came together and forced them out, setting up instead their own organisation called the Commission for Presidential Debates that has rules which virtually guarantee just the two participants in each debate.

One of our top sources for “non-mainstream” media coverage of US affairs is Democracy Now!, hosted by Amy Goodman which has been running for around 20 years.  As the two VP candidates slugged it out during the debate, Goodman had Green Party VP nominee Ajamu Baraka in studio to offer real time responses to the questions as though he were in fact part of the debate.  Libertarian nominee William Weld was also invited but apparently they offered no response.

The show recently did something similar for the first Presidential debate between Donald Trump and Secretary Hillary Clinton, with the Green Party’s Jill Stein giving her responses, also in “real time” as the feed from the main debate was paused.

What Baraka proceeds to do is highlight the similarities between the two on-stage combatants, like on the subject of war where both Republicans and Democrats come from a position of war as an inevitable option  – he presents the Greens as the party of peace.  Whether or not you agree with this stance, true believers in democracy have to appreciate the opportunity to know the option is there on their ballot paper.

Here at FPP we would love to see this method employed during the course of an Irish election campaign given our ever-expanding selection of parties and platforms.  We too have a duopoly that very much needs breaking…only in our case they are pretty much indistinguishable from each other in terms of political outlook.

 

MLK quote gets perfectly applied to #blacklivesmatter but also can be used for other struggles against injustice

In the latest Best of the Left podcast there is a segment taken from Dave Zirin’s “The Edge of Sports” where he deals with the reaction to American football player Colin Kaepernick’s refusal to stand for the US national anthem in support of the #BlackLivesMatter movement.

Zirin uses a quote from Martin Luther King to describe the reaction of several influential people from the sport’s community to the protest, whereby they essentially say “I support the ends but not the means”.

I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the white citizen’s Councillor or Ku Klux Klan-er, but the “white moderate”, who is more devoted to order than to justice, who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice.

Who constantly says “I agree with you in the goal you seek but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action”.

Who paternalistically believes they can set the timetable for another man’s freedom, who lives by a mythical concept of time. And who constantly advises the negro to wait for a more convenient season.

Personally I have more respect for someone who bravely stands up for what he believes in than I do for someone who blindly stands up for a song and a waving piece of cloth.

But I also believe the quote is significant for wider issues around the world.  Take what we have here in Ireland, like #RepealThe8th #Right2Water and #StopTTIP.  Please understand that I appreciate the many differences between those struggles and those of the African American community in the US.

What I do mean is that such struggles should not be fought against the extremists at the far end of any ideological argument.  It should instead be directed at those in between who stand with their backs to the resistance because while they do appreciate the injustice, they don’t see the point in resisting…at least not right now.  “Maybe that day will come, but it is not today”, is essentially their argument.

They should be shown that not only can it be today, but it can also be done peacefully.  If enough people believe, it can be so.

 

 

The First Presidential Debate – what the candidates weren’t asked #IssuesNotEgos

So we’ve finally seen the two candidates on the same stage at the same time – how did they get on?

It’s quite simple…Trump got in some shots and had his opponent under pressure in the early stages but Hillary came storming back, easily got under his skin and forced him into some ramblings which I doubt even he could translate into understandable English now.

But amid all the rhetoric and back-and-forth on tax returns, emails, calling women Miss Piggy and bringing up Bill’s affairs by saying you won’t bring them up, was there much actual talk about, oh I don’t know, what they’d do as President?

Sure, there was a bit about jobs, a bit about trade and a bit about secret plans to beat ISIS, but even then it was more about how bad the opponent was rather than what each candidate would do themselves.

Yet the American mainstream media lapped up the verbal mud wrestling and proceeded to make the focus of the post-game all about “who won”.

Thankfully we have the good folks at FAIR.org to give an alternative take in their piece “Lester Holt Asks Zero Questions About Poverty, Abortion, Climate Change” by Adam Johnson.

A week before the debate,Comcast-owned NBC announced the topics, and one could already tell we weren’t going to be in for a substantive evening: “Achieving prosperity,” “America’s direction” and “securing America.” This generic approach lead to a generic debate that focused mostly on horserace disputes and vague, open-ended questions about taxes and jobs.

What I find amusing is how Americans can be so bent out of shape about their media making it all about personalities when they have over 300 millions people, just two main parties (well actually there’s four but they keep the Greens and Libertarians away from these debates), and election campaigns that last well over a year.

Here in Ireland, with a humble 5 million people, we have an ever-growing amount of political parties and campaigns squeezed into just under a month, so while the “Yanks” have plenty of time to talk about issues and seem to choose not to, here our media has so little time all they get to focus on is what would the inevitable coalition look like after the unnecessarily over-complicated voting process is done.

Democratically held elections for government should be about issues not egos, but as a general public we seem content to have them portrayed like “reality” TV shows.